Ya, last time I checked we were hall'n ass to save the environment for years now. Stateisticly the U.S are the big contributers to environmental damage. And for your information its our oil companys who are the dicks, not us. And also the U.S im sure, started the whole oil sands thing. I beleve you should replace "Canadians" with "oil companys"
I went with religious fundamentalists because it covers the bases for many of those cited.
Fundamentalist Evangelicals played a large role in the two time election of George Bush, Osama bin Laden and his ilk flew planes into buildings and killed civilians to make "holy" war on the Western world, religion was exploited to perpetuate wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for most of the decade, Israel used Zionism in America to continue their aparteid regime in Palestine, conflict between Muslims and Christians played a substancial role in the Darfur crisis in Sudan, the theocratic dictatorship of Iran demonstrated that they will betray the original goals of the republican revolution to stay in power.
It is important to note that my issue is with fundamentalism, not religion as a whole. In many places religion has been a positive force this decade. For example the buddist monks who courageously stood up to the Burmese military Junta or the growing conciousness around the climate change crisis, most especially in the face of so much religious conflict last decade many religious leaders actively denounced violence and promoted greater tolerance and understanding between peoples of faith.
This was tough, but specifically asking about dick-ishness made me go with Fox. Others are more evil or perhaps have a more negative impact, but Fox epitomizes unabashed greed by knowingly pandering lies and mis-information to a woefully ignorant population. It's this selfish pursuit of market share at all costs that wins it for me.
It was a tough decision but I had to go with Fox "News". I think they've done more to undermine the free world than the others listed, which is a pretty strong assertion, I know. But they have molded soft minds for their own perverted purposes and those minds voted in Bush and Cheney, who established the atmosphere that led to the banksters nearly crashing the world economy.
Wait...Canadians destroying the environment?
Dubya, Dick and Kim
In terms of global impact? Dubya and Dick by a country mile.
In terms of sheer evil? Kim Jong-Il. No contest. The man's a monster.
AirRaven
Hard choice
I changed my mind like 4 times as I went down that list.
no he wins.
no HE wins.
no HE wins!
Protell
I chose the bankers because
Religious fundamentalists
I went with religious fundamentalists because it covers the bases for many of those cited.
Fundamentalist Evangelicals played a large role in the two time election of George Bush, Osama bin Laden and his ilk flew planes into buildings and killed civilians to make "holy" war on the Western world, religion was exploited to perpetuate wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for most of the decade, Israel used Zionism in America to continue their aparteid regime in Palestine, conflict between Muslims and Christians played a substancial role in the Darfur crisis in Sudan, the theocratic dictatorship of Iran demonstrated that they will betray the original goals of the republican revolution to stay in power.
It is important to note that my issue is with fundamentalism, not religion as a whole. In many places religion has been a positive force this decade. For example the buddist monks who courageously stood up to the Burmese military Junta or the growing conciousness around the climate change crisis, most especially in the face of so much religious conflict last decade many religious leaders actively denounced violence and promoted greater tolerance and understanding between peoples of faith.
tm croissant
Tony
I chose Tony Blair - the others are dicks too but I first thought he's be a good guy. What a dick he turned out to be!!!
Eskapismus
All?
All of the above?
Right, since who gives a
Americans
I don't see 'Americans' on the list. They're pretty much the biggest dicks.
So many choices
Oh man, so many choices. I wish I could check more than one. I have to choose between Bush/Cheney, Fox News, and Religious Fundamentalists? Cripes...
BevansDesign
Gotta go with Fox
Tough decision
It was a tough decision but I had to go with Fox "News". I think they've done more to undermine the free world than the others listed, which is a pretty strong assertion, I know. But they have molded soft minds for their own perverted purposes and those minds voted in Bush and Cheney, who established the atmosphere that led to the banksters nearly crashing the world economy.
Fox is very powerful and very malevolent.
acegibson